Rankings

Ecosystem groups38 of 184 platforms belong to 12 parent groups, defined by operational control of one parent entity — not shareholder overlap. Each platform keeps its individual B-score; no aggregate group score is computed — member scores are never combined into a group composite; the member mean shown per group is a descriptive statistic of the members, not a measurement of the group. Whether ecosystem-level dependence can be measured at all without conflating what members share is an open research track. All member scores are single-evaluator (see Validation). Each group also carries selected unscored entities — a curated selection by materiality, not an exhaustive subsidiary list; they carry no B and enter no computation, and are listed in the table under each map (on wide screens the map plots them as well). Nesting under a parent is the index’s own grouping throughout and every such row is marked: filings list entities and jurisdictions but rarely state which brand sits under which unit, and two attempts to certify nesting mechanically were broken by adversarial review. Entity names, roles and every figure remain source-linked and machine-checked. The remaining 146 platforms are single-entity in this universe.

Single-platform corporations — tier 1Below, the same network treatment for 146 corporations where exactly one product is scored in this universe: the scored platform keeps its own B; the surrounding corporate network is shown for context only, selected by materiality (not exhaustive), every row source-linked. Control nuances (VIE structures, chaebol cross-holdings, family voting pools) are stated per corporation. No corporate composite is computed, and all scores are single-evaluator (see Validation).